Reputation & narrative intelligence

A security team connected reputation exposure to threats against senior leadership

The security team at a global asset manager needed to assess security threats against a senior leader. TSC connected direct signals with the narratives, actors and events around them, then carried that context into recurring reputation and threat intelligence.

On this page

The team had to decide which signals warranted attention by assessing language, actor history, narrative momentum and planned activity. Isolated alerts did not provide enough context.

TSC connected signals to the actors, narratives and events around them.

TSC configured Genie around relevant news, social and specialist sources. The system linked new signals to known people, groups, issues and events. TSC analysts investigated the exposures that warranted attention and carried that context into the next assessment.

The data model covered political, investment, conflict and sustainability issues alongside the networks active around them. It allowed a new signal to be compared with earlier activity rather than assessed without history.

Reputation exposure entered the security brief.

The mandate widened as the team saw how reputation exposure could materialise as security risk. Analysis considered which narratives were gaining momentum, who was amplifying them and whether they connected to planned activity or events.

A weekly Reputation and Threat Watch carried the continuous view. Event maps, briefs and live dashboards supported higher-risk moments.

The current intelligence base covers more than 4,000 activist and NGO groups and assessments of more than 2,300 activist events. These records provide context for assessment. Inclusion in the intelligence base is not a threat designation.

The linked history of narratives, actors, events and assessed exposures gave the team a repeatable way to compare a new signal with what came before. The original security purpose remained in view as reputation exposure entered the brief.

Factsheet

  • 4,000+

    Activist and NGO groups were covered by the intelligence base.

    Inclusion in the intelligence base is not a threat designation.

  • 2,300+

    Activist events had been assessed.

    The records provide context for comparison and escalation.

  • A weekly Reputation and Threat Watch carried the continuous view.

Related case studies